Duración:
Visitas:5646
Calificación:

Experimental Economics / Public Choice

Dr. Vernon L. Smith
25 de marzo de 2004 | Auditorio Friedrich A. Hayek, UFM
  
  
  
  
Layout:

Get the Flash Player to see this player.

Mark Video Segment:
begin
end
play
Direct URL:

Copy and paste this link to an email or instant message
[Hide] Right click this link and add to bookmarks:


Dr. Vernon Smith

Dr. Vernon Smith
Dr. Vernon Smith is 2002 recipient of the Nobel Prize in Economics. He is professor of economics and law at George Mason University and founder of the Interdisciplinary Center for Economic Sciences of that university. He holds a PhD in Economics from Harvard University. He has been president of various institutions, including the Public Choice Society, the Economic Science Association, the Western Economic Association and the Association for Private Enterprise Education.

Fuente: www.gmu.edu
Última actualización: 29/11/2007

Créditos

Experimental Economics and Public Choice
II Seminario Introducción al Análisis de las Decisiones Públicas

Dr. Vernon Smith

Auditorio Friedrich A. Hayek
Universidad Francisco Marroquín
Guatemala, 25 de marzo de 2004

Una producción de New Media - UFM. Guatemala, marzo del 2004
Cámara: Rebeca Zuñiga, Alexander Arauz; edición digital: Rebeca Zuñiga

Referencias

  • Centro para el Análisis de las Decisiones Públicas aquí

Acerca de los seminarios interuniversitarios

Dock window
Slides
Dock windowContenido
Opening credits
Introduction by Licda. Rozzanna Pappa
Beginning of Dr. Vernon Smith's lecture
Introduction
Proposals for solving the free rider problem in public goods
The Groves-Ledyard mechanism
The unanimity principle
Results of the first Groves-Ledyard experiments
Simpler mechanisms: variations on the auction mechanism
Two public good mechanisms in practice
Elinor Ostrom's Governing the Commons
The cheesemakers' problem of grazing cows on a summer meadow
A pollution trading system
Slides illustrating my first experiments and the direction of some new ones
Experiment 1
The mechanism tested in experiment 1
The mechanism's disadvantage
The rebate rule
Results and importance of the mechanism
Questions
What is your opinion about taxes? What do you recommend for our country, given that its poverty rate is so high and that the public goods the government provides are so inefficient?
If the participants in the experiment know that they will be compensated afterwards, is it possible for them to falsify their preferences? If that were the case, would the results also be falsified?
How do you think the experiments' results would adapt to a socially and culturally different medium, like Guatemala?
How are bidding mechanisms related to voter preferences in politics?
Through Experimental Economics, can you carry out analyses of models of development for Latin America, such as the models set by the Economic Commission for Latin America, the International Monetary Fund, and the World Bank?
Economic theory has been criticized for being constrained by logical positivism. What is your opinion on this? Do you consider logical positivism an absolute or a relative epistemology?
What are your criteria for choosing the individuals who participate in the experiments?
During the last years, Nobel laureates in Economics have been Americans who propose abstract theories that have little to do with reality, while millions of people are dying. Can Experimental Economics help to alleviate poverty?
Final credits
Todos los comentarios
Selección del Editor
No hay comentarios en esta sección.
No hay comentarios en esta sección.
Universidad Francisco Marroquín

6 Calle final, zona 10
Edificio de la Escuela de Negocios
Oficina EN-103
Guatemala, Guatemala 01010
Teléfono (+502) 2338-7700 ext. 7876

Creative Commons License
El contenido de este sitio está bajo licencia de Creative Commons.
Diseño Web: ©2001 - 2009 New Media, Universidad Francisco Marroquín