Duración:
Visitas:6334
Calificación:

Experimental Economics / Public Choice

Vernon L. Smith
March 25, 2004 | Auditorio Friedrich A. Hayek, UFM
 
  
  
  
  
Layout:

Get the Flash Player to see this player.

Mark Video Segment:
begin
end
play
Direct URL:

Copy and paste this link to an email or instant message
[Hide] Right click this link and add to bookmarks:


Vernon L. Smith

Vernon L. Smith
Vernon L. Smith was awarded the 2002 Nobel Prize in Economics for his introducing experimental methods in economic analysis. He is founder of the Interdisciplinary Center for Economic Sciences, George Mason University and has been president of Public Choice Society, Economic Science Association, Western Economic Association and Association for Private Enterprise Education (APEE), among others. Smith holds a PhD in economics from Harvard University and is also honorary doctor in economics from Universidad Francisco Marroquín.

Source: www.ufm.edu
Last update: 21/06/2010

Credits

Experimental Economics and Public Choice
II Seminario Interuniversitario Economía para la Política

Vernon Smith

Friedrich A. Hayek Auditorium
Universidad Francisco Marroquín
Guatemala, March 25, 2004

A New Media - UFM production. Guatemala, March 2004
Camera: Rebeca Zuñiga, Alexander Arauz; digital editing: Rebeca Zuñiga

References

  • Centro para el Análisis de las Decisiones Públicas, here

About the interuniversitary seminars

Dock window
Slides
Dock windowContenido
Opening credits
Introduction by Licda. Rozzanna Pappa
Beginning of Vernon Smith's lecture
Introduction
Proposals for solving the free rider problem in public goods
The Groves-Ledyard mechanism
The unanimity principle
Results of the first Groves-Ledyard experiments
Simpler mechanisms: variations on the auction mechanism
Two public good mechanisms in practice
Elinor Ostrom's Governing the Commons
The cheesemakers' problem of grazing cows on a summer meadow
A pollution trading system
Slides illustrating my first experiments and the direction of some new ones
Experiment 1
The mechanism tested in experiment 1
The mechanism's disadvantage
The rebate rule
Results and importance of the mechanism
Questions
What is your opinion about taxes? What do you recommend for our country, given that its poverty rate is so high and that the public goods the government provides are so inefficient?
If the participants in the experiment know that they will be compensated afterwards, is it possible for them to falsify their preferences? If that were the case, would the results also be falsified?
How do you think the experiments' results would adapt to a socially and culturally different medium, like Guatemala?
How are bidding mechanisms related to voter preferences in politics?
Through Experimental Economics, can you carry out analyses of models of development for Latin America, such as the models set by the Economic Commission for Latin America, the International Monetary Fund, and the World Bank?
Economic theory has been criticized for being constrained by logical positivism. What is your opinion on this? Do you consider logical positivism an absolute or a relative epistemology?
What are your criteria for choosing the individuals who participate in the experiments?
During the last years, Nobel laureates in Economics have been Americans who propose abstract theories that have little to do with reality, while millions of people are dying. Can Experimental Economics help to alleviate poverty?
Final credits
Todos los comentarios
Selección del Editor
No hay comentarios en esta sección.
No hay comentarios en esta sección.
Universidad Francisco Marroquín

6 Calle final, zona 10
Edificio de la Escuela de Negocios
Oficina EN-103
Guatemala, Guatemala 01010
Teléfono (+502) 2338-7700 ext. 7849

Creative Commons License
El contenido de este sitio está bajo licencia de Creative Commons.
Diseño Web: ©2001 - 2010 New Media, Universidad Francisco Marroquín